Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(5): e2312394, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2319204

ABSTRACT

This cohort study compares the rates of SARS-CoV-2 testing and complications across 6 waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada, between individuals recently experiencing homelessness, low-income residents, and the general population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ill-Housed Persons , Humans , Ontario/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , Pandemics
3.
BMC Prim Care ; 23(1): 300, 2022 11 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2139154

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid shift in primary health care from predominantly in-person to high volumes of virtual care. The pandemic afforded the opportunity to conduct a deep regional examination of virtual care by family physicians in London and Middlesex County, Ontario, Canada that would inform the foundation for virtual care in our region post-pandemic. OBJECTIVES: (1) to determine volumes of in-person and virtual family physicians visits and characteristics of the family physicians and patients using them during the early COVID-19 pandemic; (2) to determine how virtual visit volumes changed over the pandemic, compared to in-person; and (3) to explore family physicians' experience in virtual visit adoption and implementation. METHODS: We conducted a concurrent mixed-methods study of family physicians from March to October 2020. The quantitative component examined mean weekly number of total, in-person and virtual visits using health administrative data. Differences in outcomes according to physician and practice characteristics for pandemic periods were compared to pre-pandemic. The qualitative study employed Constructivist Grounded Theory, conducting semi-structured family physicians interviews; analyzing data iteratively using constant comparative analysis. We mapped themes from the qualitative analysis to quantitative findings. RESULTS: Initial volumes of patients decreased, driven by fewer in-person visits. Virtual visit volumes increased dramatically; family physicians described using telephone almost entirely. Rural family physicians reported video connectivity issues. By early second wave, total family physician visit volume returned to pre-pandemic volumes. In-person visits increased substantially; family physicians reported this happened because previously scarce personal protective equipment became available. Patients seen during the pandemic were older, sicker, and more materially deprived. CONCLUSION: These results can inform the future of virtual family physician care including the importance of continued virtual care compensation, the need for equitable family physician payment models, and the need to attend to equity for vulnerable patients. Given the move to virtual care was primarily a move to telephone care, the modality of care delivery that is acceptable to both family physicians and their patients must be considered.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physicians, Family , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Qualitative Research , Ontario/epidemiology
4.
Nurs Forum ; 2022 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1992879

ABSTRACT

AIM: To provide a critical analysis of the concept of moral distress (MD) in critical care (CC) nursing. BACKGROUND: Despite extensive inquiry pertaining to the legitimacy of MD within nursing discourse, some authors still question its relevancy to the profession. However, amid the global COVID-19 pandemic, MD is generating a significant amount of discussion anew, warranting the further exploration of the concept within CC nursing to provide clarity and expand on the definition. DESIGN: Rodger's Evolutionary Concept Analysis method was used to guide this analysis. METHODS: Related terms, attributes, antecedents, and consequences of MD were identified using current literature. RESULTS: The results of this analysis demonstrate strong congruence between the attributes, antecedents, and negative consequences pertaining to MD. However, a new theme has emerged from this review of the contemporary literature, highlighting the potential unexpected positive outcomes perceived by nurses who experience MD, including the provision of better care, increased levels of empathy, and enhanced opportunities for ethical reflection.

5.
Gut ; 2022 Jul 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1932779

ABSTRACT

Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has a high sensitivity for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). In a symptomatic population FIT may identify those patients who require colorectal investigation with the highest priority. FIT offers considerable advantages over the use of symptoms alone, as an objective measure of risk with a vastly superior positive predictive value for CRC, while conversely identifying a truly low risk cohort of patients. The aim of this guideline was to provide a clear strategy for the use of FIT in the diagnostic pathway of people with signs or symptoms of a suspected diagnosis of CRC. The guideline was jointly developed by the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/British Society of Gastroenterology, specifically by a 21-member multidisciplinary guideline development group (GDG). A systematic review of 13 535 publications was undertaken to develop 23 evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations for the triage of people with symptoms of a suspected CRC diagnosis in primary care. In order to achieve consensus among a broad group of key stakeholders, we completed an extended Delphi of the GDG, and also 61 other individuals across the UK and Ireland, including by members of the public, charities and primary and secondary care. Seventeen research recommendations were also prioritised to inform clinical management.

6.
Nurs Forum ; 57(5): 893-897, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1816616

ABSTRACT

AIM: To explore the concept of vicarious trauma (VT) and clarify its fundamental meaning and distinctiveness as a psychological phenomenon experienced by nurses. BACKGROUND: The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has incited significant psychological distress on nursing professionals worldwide. There is growing knowledge of the negative outcomes of this distress including the manifestation of nursing burnout syndrome, compassion fatigue, and vicarious traumatization (VT). These concepts have often been used interchangeably throughout nursing discourse creating confusion surrounding their uses and unique attributes. DESIGN: Walker and Avant's method of concept analysis. RESULTS: VT is a psychological phenomenon that causes a permanent cognitive shift in the inner experience and world views of nurses after prolonged empathetic engagement with a patient's trauma. VT manifests as physical and emotional symptoms of distress, which can disrupt a nurses ability to provide competent care. Contradictions within the literature exist when defining VT, burnout syndrome, and compassion fatigue, creating difficulty identifying attributes and consequences unique to VT. CONCLUSION: More empiric rigor is needed to adequately operationalize VT. Given the traumatic nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, immediate policy and education attention should be directed towards understanding the relationship between nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic and the prevalence of VT.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional , COVID-19 , Compassion Fatigue , Psychological Distress , Burnout, Professional/etiology , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Compassion Fatigue/etiology , Humans , Pandemics
7.
Lancet Public Health ; 7(4): e366-e377, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1730182

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People experiencing homelessness face a high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission, as well as health complications and death due to COVID-19. Despite being prioritised for receiving the COVID-19 vaccine in many regions, little data are available on vaccine uptake in this vulnerable population. Using population-based health-care administrative data from Ontario, Canada-a region with a universal, publicly funded health system-we aimed to describe COVID-19 vaccine coverage (ie, the estimated percentage of people who have received a vaccine) and determinants of vaccine receipt among individuals with a recent history of homelessness. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of adults (aged ≥18 years) with a recent experience of homelessness, inadequate housing, or shelter use as recorded in routinely collected health-care databases between June 14, 2020, and June 14, 2021 (a period within 6 months of Dec 14, 2020, when COVID-19 vaccine administration was initiated in Ontario). Participants were followed up from Dec 14, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021, for the receipt of one or two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine using the province's real-time centralised vaccine information system. We described COVID-19 vaccine coverage overall and within predefined subgroups. Using modified Poisson regression, we further identified sociodemographic factors, health-care usage, and clinical factors associated with receipt of at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. FINDINGS: 23 247 individuals with a recent history of homelessness were included in this study. Participants were predominantly male (14 752 [63·5%] of 23 247); nearly half were younger than 40 years (11 521 [49·6%]) and lived in large metropolitan regions (12 123 [52·2%]); and the majority (18 226 [78·4%]) visited a general practitioner for an in-person consultation during the observation period. By Sept 30, 2021, 14 271 (61·4%; 95% CI 60·8-62·0) individuals with a recent history of homelessness had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine and 11 082 (47·7%; 47·0-48·3) had received two doses; in comparison, over the same period, 86·6% of adults in the total Ontario population had received a first dose and 81·6% had received a second dose. In multivariable analysis, factors positively associated with COVID-19 uptake were one or more outpatient visits to a general practitioner (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1·37 [95% CI 1·31-1·42]), older age (50-59 years vs 18-29 years: 1·18 [1·14-1·22], ≥60 years vs 18-29 years: 1·27 [1·22-1·31]), receipt of an influenza vaccine in either of the two previous influenza seasons (1·25 [1·23-1·28]), being identified as homeless via a visit to a community health centre versus exclusively a hospital-based encounter (1·13 [1·10-1·15]), receipt of one or more SARS-CoV-2 tests between March 1, 2020, and Sept 30, 2021 (1·23 [1·20-1·26]), and the presence of chronic health conditions (one condition: 1·05 [1·03-1·08]; two or more conditions: 1·11 [1·08-1·14]). By contrast, living in a smaller metropolitan region (aRR 0·92 [95% CI 0·90-0·94]) or rural location (0·93 [0·90-0·97]) versus large metropolitan regions were associated with lower uptake. INTERPRETATION: In Ontario, COVID-19 vaccine coverage among adults with a recent history of homelessness has lagged and, as of Sept 30, 2021, was 25 percentage points lower than that of the general adult population in Ontario for a first dose and 34 percentage points lower for a second dose. With high usage of outpatient health services among individuals with a recent history of homelessness, better utilisation of outpatient primary care structures might offer an opportunity to increase vaccine coverage in this population. Our findings underscore the importance of leveraging existing health and service organisations that are accessed and trusted by people who experience homelessness for targeted vaccine delivery. FUNDING: The Public Health Agency of Canada. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ill-Housed Persons , Vaccines , Adolescent , Adult , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Ontario/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont) ; 34(4): 86-96, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1630552

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of virtual care in healthcare contexts globally, inclusive of nursing care. Along with the rapid adoption of virtual care by the nursing profession, reflections regarding how best to leverage virtual care in nurse-patient relationships and as an innovative model of care have begun to emerge in both the literature and nursing discourse. Subsequently, the purposes of this paper are to (1) provide a reflection on the significant innovation in virtual care in nursing that was established during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) suggest future strategic directions for the profession in order to retain the benefits related to virtual care becoming more widely adopted into various nursing roles and activities. It is hoped that through this reflection and presentation of strategic directions, nurses and their associated leadership can identify viable future pathways to help evolve the use and delivery of virtual care in the profession for a post-pandemic world.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Leadership , Nurse's Role , SARS-CoV-2
9.
BMJ : British Medical Journal (Online) ; 373, 2021.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1269780

ABSTRACT

Transformation into a digitally enabled profession will maximize the benefits to patient care, write Richard Booth and colleagues

10.
CMAJ Open ; 9(1): E1-E9, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1029857

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People with a recent history of homelessness are believed to be at high risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and, when infected, complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We describe and compare testing for SARS-CoV-2, test positivity and hospital admission, receipt of intensive care and mortality rates related to COVID-19 for people with a recent history of homelessness versus community-dwelling people as of July 31, 2020. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada, between Jan. 23 and July 31, 2020, using linked health administrative data among people who either had a recent history of homelessness or were dwelling in the community. People were included if they were eligible for provincial health care coverage and not living in an institutionalized facility on Jan. 23, 2020. We examined testing for SARS-CoV-2, test positivity and complication outcomes of COVID-19 (hospital admission, admission to intensive care and death) within 21 days of a positive test result. Extended multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) in 3 time periods: preshutdown (Jan. 23-Mar. 13), peak (Mar. 14-June 16) and reopening (June 17-July 31). RESULTS: People with a recent history of homelessness (n = 29 407) were more likely to be tested for SARS-CoV-2 in all 3 periods compared with community-dwelling people (n = 14 494 301) (preshutdown adjusted HR 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-2.11; peak adjusted HR 2.95, 95% CI 2.88-3.03; reopening adjusted HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.39-1.51). They were also more likely to have a positive test result (peak adjusted HR 3.66, 95% CI 3.22-4.16; reopening adjusted HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.15-2.71). In the peak period, people with a recent history of homelessness were over 20 times more likely to be admitted to hospital for COVID-19 (adjusted HR 20.35, 95% CI 16.23-25.53), over 10 times more likely to require intensive care for COVID-19 (adjusted HR 10.20, 95% CI 5.81-17.93) and over 5 times more likely to die within 21 days of their first positive test result (adjusted HR 5.73, 95% CI 3.01-10.91). INTERPRETATION: In Ontario, people with a recent history of homelessness were significantly more likely to be tested for SARS-CoV-2, to have a positive test result, to be admitted to hospital for COVID-19, to receive intensive care for COVID-19 and to die of COVID-19 compared with community-dwelling people. People with a recent history of homelessness should continue to be considered particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and its complications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Critical Care , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Ill-Housed Persons/statistics & numerical data , Independent Living/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mortality , Ontario/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Vulnerable Populations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL